Reed v. Goertz
598 U.S. 230 · Decided April 19, 2023 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Reed v. Goertz was decided on April 19, 2023 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miscellaneous criminal procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 598 U.S. 230 · 143 S. Ct. 955 · 215 L. Ed. 2d 218 · 2023 U.S. LEXIS 1665
- Docket number
- 21-442
- Decided
- April 19, 2023
- Argued
- October 11, 2022
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Brett M. Kavanaugh
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Miscellaneous criminal procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Dissent | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Majority |
Full case caption
Reed v. Goertz
SCDB identifiers: case 2022-005, docket 2022-005-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Miscellaneous criminal procedure”
- Smith v. United States
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. BruenLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Rahimi
- Wolford v. LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Otis McDonald v. City of ChicagoAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. HellerLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
- Williams v. Reed
- Lackey v. Stinnie
- McDonough v. Smith
- Ziglar v. Abbasi
- Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez
- Kingsley v. Hendrickson
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States
- Percoco v. United States
- Ciminelli v. United States
- Dubin v. United States
- Smith v. United States
- Lora v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error