Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez
137 S. Ct. 1539 · Decided May 30, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez was decided on May 30, 2017 unanimously (8–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Liability under civil rights acts” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 1539 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 52 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3396
- Docket number
- 16-369
- Decided
- May 30, 2017
- Argued
- March 22, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Samuel A. Alito Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Liability under civil rights acts
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Did not participate: Neil M. Gorsuch.
Full case caption
Cty. of Los Angeles v. Mendez
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-055, docket 2016-055-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Liability under civil rights acts”
- Ziglar v. Abbasi
- Ross v. Blake
- Kingsley v. Hendrickson
- Taylor v. Barkes
- McDonough v. Smith
- Jeremy Carroll v. Andrew Carman
Cases on the same legal provision: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts)
- Reed v. Goertz
- Williams v. Reed
- Lackey v. Stinnie
- Lisa Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee
- Reginald A. Wilkinson v. William Dwight Dotson
- Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools
- Bethune-Hill v. Va Bd. of Elections
- Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1
- Lewis v. Clarke
- Midland Funding LLC v. Johnson
- Cooper v. HarrisLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error