Schiavone v. Fortune
477 U.S. 21 · Decided June 18, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Schiavone v. Fortune was decided on June 18, 1986 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 477 U.S. 21 · 106 S. Ct. 2379 · 91 L. Ed. 2d 18 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 106
- Docket number
- 84-1839
- Decided
- June 18, 1986
- Argued
- February 26, 1986
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Schiavone et al. v. Fortune, aka Time, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-116, docket 1985-116-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
- Acosta v. Louisiana Department of Health and Human Resources
- Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.
- Marino v. Ortiz
- Mercilyn Buchanan Etc. v. Stanships, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington
- Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Panduit Corp.
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD v. Zenith Radio Corp.
- West v. Conrail
- Hilton v. Braunskill
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals Service
- Lake Coal Co., Inc. v. Roberts & Schaefer Co.
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama Bank
- United States v. Koecher
- Paulussen v. Herion
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error