South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Alabama
526 U.S. 160 · Decided March 23, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Alabama was decided on March 23, 1999 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 526 U.S. 160 · 119 S. Ct. 1180 · 143 L. Ed. 2d 258 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2188
- Docket number
- 97-2045
- Decided
- March 23, 1999
- Argued
- January 19, 1999
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
South Central Bell Telephone Company, et al. v. Alabama et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1998-037, docket 1998-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Newsweek, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue
- Christopher H. Lunding v. New York Tax Appeals TribunalLaw held unconstitutional
- Camps Newfound/owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonLaw held unconstitutional
- Director of Revenue of Missouri v. Cobank Acb
- General Motors Corporation v. Roger W. Tracy
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Peter E. Walsh
- West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Jonathan HealyLaw held unconstitutional
- C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of ClarkstownLaw held unconstitutional
- Jennifer M. Granholm v. Eleanor HealdLaw held unconstitutional
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. and Usf Holland, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
- New York v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Wayne K. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.
- Nynex Corporation v. Discon
- El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng
- Jane M. Roberts v. Galen of Virginia, Inc.
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
- AT&T Corporation v. Iowa Utilities Board
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error