State of Alabama v. State of North Carolina.
560 U.S. 330 · Decided June 1, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
State of Alabama v. State of North Carolina. was decided on June 1, 2010 by a vote of 6–3. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 560 U.S. 330 · 130 S. Ct. 2295 · 176 L. Ed. 2d 1070 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4381
- Docket number
- 132, Orig.
- Decided
- June 1, 2010
- Argued
- January 11, 2010
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Original jurisdiction
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate compact
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Concurrence |
Full case caption
State of Alabama, et Al., Plaintiffs v. State of North Carolina.
SCDB identifiers: case 2009-060, docket 2009-060-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Monsanto Company v. Geertson Seed Farms
- Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
- American Electric Power Company, Inc. v. Connecticut
- Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States
- Donald C. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
- PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate compact
- State of New Jersey v. State of Delaware
- Tarrant Regional Water District v. Rudolf John Herrmann
- Montana v. Wyoming
- State of Kansas v. State of Colorado
- Texas v. New Mexico
- State of New Jersey v. State of New York
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission
- Hemi Group, LLC and Kai Gachupin v. City of New York
- Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co. LLC
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Irvin Muchnick
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Francisco J. Espinosa
- Jerry N. Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error