NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission
558 U.S. 165 · Decided January 13, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission was decided on January 13, 2010 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Electric power regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 558 U.S. 165 · 130 S. Ct. 693 · 175 L. Ed. 2d 642 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 532
- Docket number
- 08-674
- Decided
- January 13, 2010
- Argued
- November 3, 2009
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Electric power regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Power Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority |
Full case caption
NRG Power Marketing, LLC, et al. v. Maine Public Utilities Commission et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2009-019, docket 2009-019-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Electric power regulation”
- Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association
- West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Power Act
- Hughes v. PPL Energyplus
- Entergy Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi ex Rel. Moore
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Hemi Group, LLC and Kai Gachupin v. City of New York
- Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co. LLC
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Irvin Muchnick
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Francisco J. Espinosa
- Jerry N. Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.
- Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. United States ex Rel. Karen T. Wilson
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error