United States v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
329 U.S. 424 · Decided January 6, 1947 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Seatrain Lines, Inc. was decided on January 6, 1947 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Boat transportation regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 329 U.S. 424 · 67 S. Ct. 435 · 91 L. Ed. 396 · 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2902
- Docket number
- 61
- Decided
- January 6, 1947
- Argued
- December 9, 1946
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Boat transportation regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
United States et al. v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1946-029, docket 1946-029-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Boat transportation regulation”
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling
- Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
- Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc.
- Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United States
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime Commission
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- New York v. United States
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. Daniel
- United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co.
- Schwabacher v. United States
- Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United States
- Chicago v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerAltered precedent
- Champlin Refining Co. v. United States
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co., Inc.
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationLaw held unconstitutional
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error