United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co.
333 U.S. 771 · Decided April 26, 1948 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co. was decided on April 26, 1948 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Railroad regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 333 U.S. 771 · 68 S. Ct. 868 · 92 L. Ed. 2d 1077 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2737
- Docket number
- 198
- Decided
- April 26, 1948
- Argued
- February 2, 1948
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Robert H. Jackson
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Railroad regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Interstate Commerce Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice Frank Murphy | Dissent | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Wiley B. Rutledge | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1947-069, docket 1947-069-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Railroad regulation”
- United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
- Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United States
- Chicago v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.
- New York v. United States
- United States v. Jones
- United States v. Powell
Cases on the same legal provision: Interstate Commerce Act
- Schwabacher v. United States
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. Daniel
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Mechling
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
- United States v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.
- United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Association
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill
- International Salt Co., Inc. v. United States
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United States
- Lillie v. Thompson
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana
- Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error