Wardius v. Oregon
412 U.S. 470 · Decided June 11, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Wardius v. Oregon was decided on June 11, 1973 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Self-incrimination (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 412 U.S. 470 · 93 S. Ct. 2208 · 37 L. Ed. 2d 82 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 56
- Docket number
- 71-6042
- Decided
- June 11, 1973
- Argued
- January 10, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Self-incrimination (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Wardius v. Oregon
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-138, docket 1972-138-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Self-incrimination (general)”
- Couch v. United States
- United States v. Kahan
- Bellis v. United States
- Brooks v. TennesseeLaw held unconstitutional
- California v. Byers
- United States v. Freed
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Vlandis v. KlineLaw held unconstitutional
- Douglas v. Buder
- Ortwein v. Schwab
- Roe v. WadeLaw held unconstitutional
- Doe v. BoltonLaw held unconstitutional
- Ham v. South Carolina
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Murch v. Mottram
- Webb v. Texas
- Cool v. United States
- Neil v. Biggers
- Swenson v. Stidham
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error