Wengler v. Druggists Mutual Insurance Co.
446 U.S. 142 · Decided April 22, 1980 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Wengler v. Druggists Mutual Insurance Co. was decided on April 22, 1980 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 446 U.S. 142 · 100 S. Ct. 1540 · 64 L. Ed. 2d 107 · 1980 U.S. LEXIS 122
- Docket number
- 79-381
- Decided
- April 22, 1980
- Argued
- February 25, 1980
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Sex discrimination (excluding employment)
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Wengler v. Druggists Mutual Insurance Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1979-074, docket 1979-074-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Sex discrimination (excluding employment)”
- Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney
- Kirchberg v. FeenstraLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County (California
- Parham v. Hughes
- Caban v. Mohammed et Ux.Law held unconstitutional
- Orr v. OrrLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Carey v. BrownLaw held unconstitutional
- Williams v. Zbaraz
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
- Columbus Board of Education v. Penick
- Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman
- Rose v. Mitchell
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Board of Education of the City School District of New York v. Harris
- Vance v. Terrazas
- Martinez v. California
- California Brewers Assn. v. Bryant
- United States v. Clark
- United States v. Clarke
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error