Withrow v. Larkin
421 U.S. 35 · Decided April 16, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Withrow v. Larkin was decided on April 16, 1975 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, impartial decision maker” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 421 U.S. 35 · 95 S. Ct. 1456 · 43 L. Ed. 2d 712 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 56
- Docket number
- 73-1573
- Decided
- April 16, 1975
- Argued
- December 18, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, impartial decision maker
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Withrow et al. v. Larkin
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-082, docket 1974-082-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, impartial decision maker”
- Taylor v. Hayes
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Assn.
- Connally v. GeorgiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleLaw held unconstitutional
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.
- United States v. Raddatz
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Mullaney v. WilburLaw held unconstitutional
- Drope v. Missouri
- Murphy v. Florida
- O'Connor v. Donaldson
- Goss v. LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corp.
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
- Goss v. LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Drope v. Missouri
- Mullaney v. WilburLaw held unconstitutional
- O'Connor v. Donaldson
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error