Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation
512 U.S. 136 · Decided June 13, 1994 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation was decided on June 13, 1994 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 512 U.S. 136 · 114 S. Ct. 2084 · 129 L. Ed. 2d 118 · 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4443
- Docket number
- 93-639
- Decided
- June 13, 1994
- Argued
- April 19, 1994
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- Harry A. Blackmun
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, attorneys
- Issue area
- Attorneys
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Board of Accountancy
SCDB identifiers: case 1993-073, docket 1993-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”
- Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.
- Gary E. Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar AssociationLaw held unconstitutional
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioLaw held unconstitutional
- In re R. M. J.Law held unconstitutional
- Milavetz v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- City of Ladue v. Margaret P. GilleoLaw held unconstitutional
- Cynthia Waters v. Cheryl R. Churchill
- Judy Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
- Michael A. Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
- United States v. National Treasury Employees UnionLaw held unconstitutional
- Joseph McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Attorneys)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error