CaseTrail

Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation

512 U.S. 136 · Decided June 13, 1994 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation was decided on June 13, 1994 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
512 U.S. 136 · 114 S. Ct. 2084 · 129 L. Ed. 2d 118 · 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4443
Docket number
93-639
Decided
June 13, 1994
Argued
April 19, 1994
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
7–2
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
Harry A. Blackmun
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Silvia S. Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Board of Accountancy

SCDB identifiers: case 1993-073, docket 1993-073-01.

Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error