The Dutra Group v. Batterton
139 S. Ct. 2275 · Decided June 24, 2019 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
The Dutra Group v. Batterton was decided on June 24, 2019 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Punitive damages” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2018
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-266
Case details
- Citations
- 139 S. Ct. 2275 · 204 L. Ed. 2d 692 · 2019 U.S. LEXIS 4202
- Docket number
- 18-266
- Decided
- June 24, 2019
- Argued
- March 25, 2019
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Samuel A. Alito Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Punitive damages
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Type of law
- No legal provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
The Dutra Group v. Batterton
SCDB identifiers: case 2018-060, docket 2018-060-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Punitive damages”
- Paroline v. United States
- Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc. v. Edgar L. Townsend
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
- Philip Morris USA v. Mayola Williams
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Inez Preece Campbell and Matthew C. Barneck
- Kay Barnes, Etc. v. Jeffrey Gorman
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Escondido v. Emmons
- Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
- Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
- Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
- Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error