In re Griffiths
413 U.S. 717 · Decided June 25, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
In re Griffiths was decided on June 25, 1973 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employability of aliens” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 413 U.S. 717 · 93 S. Ct. 2851 · 37 L. Ed. 2d 910 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 35
- Docket number
- 71-1336
- Decided
- June 25, 1973
- Argued
- January 9, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- William O. Douglas
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employability of aliens
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
In re Griffiths
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-181, docket 1972-181-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employability of aliens”
- Sugarman v. DougallLaw held unconstitutional
- Espinoza et Vir v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Inc.
- Saxbe v. Bustos
- De Canas v. Bica
- Hampton v. Mow Sun WongLaw held unconstitutional
- Examining Board of Engineers v. Flores de OteroLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Norwood v. Harrison
- Keyes v. School District No. 1
- Gaffney v. Cummings
- White v. RegesterLaw held unconstitutional
- New Jersey Welfare Rights Organization v. CahillLaw held unconstitutional
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error